↓ Skip to main content

Halogenation of glycopeptide antibiotics occurs at the amino acid level during non-ribosomal peptide synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Chemical Science, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
Halogenation of glycopeptide antibiotics occurs at the amino acid level during non-ribosomal peptide synthesis
Published in
Chemical Science, January 2017
DOI 10.1039/c7sc00460e
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tiia Kittilä, Claudia Kittel, Julien Tailhades, Diane Butz, Melanie Schoppet, Anita Büttner, Rob J. A. Goode, Ralf B. Schittenhelm, Karl-Heinz van Pee, Roderich D. Süssmuth, Wolfgang Wohlleben, Max J. Cryle, Evi Stegmann

Abstract

Halogenation plays a significant role in the activity of the glycopeptide antibiotics (GPAs), although up until now the timing and therefore exact substrate involved was unclear. Here, we present results combined from in vivo and in vitro studies that reveal the substrates for the halogenase enzymes from GPA biosynthesis as amino acid residues bound to peptidyl carrier protein (PCP)-domains from the non-ribosomal peptide synthetase machinery: no activity was detected upon either free amino acids or PCP-bound peptides. Furthermore, we show that the selectivity of GPA halogenase enzymes depends upon both the structure of the bound amino acid and the PCP domain, rather than being driven solely via the PCP domain. These studies provide the first detailed understanding of how halogenation is performed during GPA biosynthesis and highlight the importance and versatility of trans-acting enzymes that operate during peptide assembly by non-ribosomal peptide synthetases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 18 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 29%
Chemistry 18 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 21 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2020.
All research outputs
#546,543
of 22,988,380 outputs
Outputs from Chemical Science
#93
of 7,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,032
of 421,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemical Science
#6
of 615 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,988,380 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 615 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.