↓ Skip to main content

Discrimination in hiring based on potential and realized fertility: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment

Overview of attention for article published in Labour Economics, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 1,356)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
129 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
Title
Discrimination in hiring based on potential and realized fertility: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment
Published in
Labour Economics, August 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.labeco.2019.04.009
Authors

Sascha O. Becker, Ana Fernandes, Doris Weichselbaumer

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 129 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 162 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 17%
Researcher 21 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 56 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 38 23%
Social Sciences 26 16%
Business, Management and Accounting 14 9%
Psychology 4 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 61 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 163. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2024.
All research outputs
#271,486
of 26,744,825 outputs
Outputs from Labour Economics
#16
of 1,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,019
of 363,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Labour Economics
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,744,825 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.